{"id":"W2041297422","doi":"10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782","title":"ASTROMETRY.NET: BLIND ASTROMETRIC CALIBRATION OF ARBITRARY ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Astronomical Journal","topic":"Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1036,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Astrometry; False positive paradox; Artificial intelligence; Scale (ratio); Stars; Computer vision; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003853077,0.0002267705,0.0002950603,0.0002938406,0.0001426314,0.0001411872,0.0004748592,0.0001054099,0.0006642214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004004587,0.0001795174,0.0002001166,0.0003112521,0.0002083486,0.0006049104,0.00006230064,0.001107264,0.00003365377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008420412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007265517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006720036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001969166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998441,0.00005552563,0.000741737,0.0001653642,0.0002020493,0.0003942945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991046,0.0001349402,0.0002062821,0.0002880025,0.00005124555,0.0002149019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003417408,0.0003470813,0.4515569,0.00002616602,0.0005267355,9.018547e-7,0.0001663805,0.1469518,0.2891743,0.002476184,0.003511861,0.10492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00167926,0.0001969207,0.9082969,0.00001554494,0.00007268846,0.00002774209,0.0001625656,0.0650508,0.02310566,0.0002932871,0.0008173063,0.0002813509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370778,0.00003042325,0.06153399,0.0002330001,0.0006718241,0.0001448749,0.00003078926,0.00004958752,0.0002277161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575533,0.000003959158,0.04162236,0.00001070346,0.0007201048,0.000008855193,0.00002736927,0.0000380376,0.00001535013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.45674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7320506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00959605676762477,"score_gpt":0.2124894100163869,"score_spread":0.2028933532487622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}