{"id":"W2041297422","doi":"10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782","title":"ASTROMETRY.NET: BLIND ASTROMETRIC CALIBRATION OF ARBITRARY ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Astronomical Journal","topic":"Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1036,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Astrometry; False positive paradox; Artificial intelligence; Scale (ratio); Stars; Computer vision; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007225984,0.001937905,0.001204504,0.004582,0.0009749816,0.003461014,0.003733554,0.001376057,0.0237265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023379,0.001434852,0.001028691,0.002417583,0.001279716,0.006123405,0.005971716,0.001951025,0.03854489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001338314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001907333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003969303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004341304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945881,0.0007672801,0.0003697461,0.0009463817,0.003053385,0.0002750182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864976,0.001603203,0.00129934,0.00816047,0.00190674,0.0005326484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001489297,0.0002463548,0.01827127,0.0007580624,0.0004358121,0.00033875,0.0005476248,0.007286451,0.02177111,0.02349281,0.3721568,0.5532055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004130037,0.0003537852,0.02103312,0.000379901,0.0001260178,0.0007089159,0.0002206248,0.2087668,0.1136473,0.0804126,0.5735042,0.0004337613],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"software","genre_scores_codex":[0.00812663,0.000463556,0.3997969,0.0005758312,0.0005680744,0.0004574163,0.02814611,0.5470269,0.01483851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1378027,0.000626908,0.6428289,0.0009645969,0.0005082525,0.0008584402,0.1219734,0.06880452,0.02563221],"genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":"software","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0237265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00959605676762477,"score_gpt":0.2124894100163869,"score_spread":0.2028933532487622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}