{"id":"W2041335425","doi":"10.1115/detc2009-87733","title":"A Penalty Formulation for Dynamics Analysis of Redundant Mechanical Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gravitational singularity; Redundancy (engineering); Mechanical system; Robustness (evolution); Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Penalty method; Inverse; Inverse dynamics; Mathematical optimization; Control engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Classical mechanics; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002623442,0.0000996,0.0003926724,0.0001412082,0.00002156381,0.00002605343,0.0001096266,0.00008766364,0.000007104698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001734064,0.00008422331,0.0002341655,0.0003207449,0.000001748311,0.00005734386,0.000005428439,0.00004272457,0.000001252645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001087548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006625327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003787524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991297,0.00000996078,0.0004207364,0.0001185022,0.0001529555,0.0001681967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995665,0.00005737332,0.00005919431,0.0001838796,0.00007238409,0.00006068587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002313978,0.00002836712,0.00001692304,0.00004427358,0.0005436854,3.737947e-7,0.0000111102,0.2161775,0.005038817,0.7736586,0.000049443,0.004407809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002910554,0.00009706979,0.0003148402,0.00001227279,0.0003581847,7.274315e-7,0.0000267356,0.9968275,0.00007696075,0.001763468,0.0001291466,0.0001020708],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04341316,0.00007427834,0.9538769,0.00006795332,0.0002077318,0.0003539174,0.00004753101,0.0001258656,0.00183267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988138,0.00000603112,0.0009154087,0.00001389416,0.00003373986,0.0000169547,0.00005737596,0.00001001882,0.0001327829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3434527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007578746161594676,"score_gpt":0.2202318006421682,"score_spread":0.2126530544805736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}