{"id":"W2041335425","doi":"10.1115/detc2009-87733","title":"A Penalty Formulation for Dynamics Analysis of Redundant Mechanical Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gravitational singularity; Redundancy (engineering); Mechanical system; Robustness (evolution); Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Penalty method; Inverse; Inverse dynamics; Mathematical optimization; Control engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Classical mechanics; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006216096,0.0009597771,0.0005169348,0.0005000465,0.0003032355,0.0007254176,0.0006943157,0.0006972359,0.003201801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001182465,0.0002711058,0.0004205997,0.0004074115,0.0006606124,0.001095571,0.0009559423,0.0009849679,0.0006498109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000317862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005325848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007096809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000601846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996694,0.0000991206,0.0000153576,0.00003702072,0.0001531174,0.00002591784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996483,0.000136398,0.00004792076,0.00003097344,0.00009408619,0.00004226669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005662512,0.00004467176,0.0002705264,0.000196221,0.00002763436,0.0003314348,0.00007164165,0.5768764,0.009927667,0.373196,0.003016947,0.03598425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004990251,0.00002529675,0.00006206396,0.000009342774,0.000002528437,0.00004249681,0.000007322103,0.9552252,0.0004793076,0.0413567,0.002777533,0.000007315402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005043017,0.0002252948,0.9887192,0.0001852434,0.00006303492,0.00001928759,0.00005515197,0.00004329493,0.005646508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6346733,0.00122363,0.336148,0.0002335548,0.0003326931,0.000345497,0.0004089331,0.0002604163,0.02637411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003201801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01071113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007578746161594676,"score_gpt":0.2202318006421682,"score_spread":0.2126530544805736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}