{"id":"W2041402753","doi":"10.1139/x09-002","title":"Estimating Quebec provincial forest resources using ICESat/GLAS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Centre de Géomatique du Québec","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Environmental science; Taiga; Tundra; Lidar; Altimeter; Vegetation (pathology); Forest inventory; Sampling (signal processing); Boreal; Canopy; Remote sensing; Physical geography; Forestry; Geography; Geology; Forest management; Arctic; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003436255,0.0004379324,0.0002008476,0.001530193,0.0008178626,0.0008317311,0.000534882,0.000163463,0.004162114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001004827,0.0002069755,0.0002997123,0.001971452,0.0002049964,0.0003563449,0.0003300652,0.0002397634,0.0005690503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01714822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01024188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997597,0.0000228135,0.000007956549,0.00005890672,0.00009811445,0.00005245472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998865,0.00008183858,0.00007495606,0.0000421387,0.0008594603,0.00007662712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002058934,0.000115336,0.8003361,0.0001496767,0.000255676,0.0002030283,0.0004529095,0.04959622,0.004276832,0.00194709,0.02714478,0.1153164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004535839,0.00002237029,0.847767,0.0000563989,0.00006450115,0.0000352165,0.0004481477,0.1271634,0.002059703,0.0002213033,0.02208082,0.00003568324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091688,0.0004777682,0.0126657,0.0003277225,0.00001922359,0.0002634173,0.05854286,0.0006515651,0.01788301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597705,0.0001956074,0.01204938,0.00007632912,0.000006203397,0.0001179559,0.01809818,0.00005833817,0.009627529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01714822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1244196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03715848975353744,"score_gpt":0.3126809477111601,"score_spread":0.2755224579576226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}