{"id":"W2041402753","doi":"10.1139/x09-002","title":"Estimating Quebec provincial forest resources using ICESat/GLAS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Centre de Géomatique du Québec","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Environmental science; Taiga; Tundra; Lidar; Altimeter; Vegetation (pathology); Forest inventory; Sampling (signal processing); Boreal; Canopy; Remote sensing; Physical geography; Forestry; Geography; Geology; Forest management; Arctic; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347847,0.0001072708,0.0001533486,0.0003030768,0.0007361,0.0002384651,0.0004862378,0.00008347001,0.0001604407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004171238,0.00009533221,0.00007542616,0.0005860847,0.0004372198,0.0002507241,0.00002926073,0.0005644929,0.00008566572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008323257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008560368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3163201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8296385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980928,0.0001271505,0.0003344363,0.0001837047,0.0006259372,0.000635959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985872,0.0001059717,0.000141959,0.0002489563,0.0001090428,0.0008068544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006319398,0.00009235378,0.6299354,0.00002296235,0.00003054151,0.0007027421,0.006205646,0.1071868,0.004569167,0.001723099,0.01733373,0.2321344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003956188,0.0003268019,0.9059317,0.0001648216,0.00001797632,0.0004646343,0.0004922269,0.02677719,0.0002142896,0.007747535,0.05719686,0.0002704103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862099,0.0000608573,0.0009965271,0.001101908,0.00009231025,0.0001571989,0.000002774171,0.000006244753,0.01137225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99038,0.000001069148,0.008481399,0.00007352358,0.0004539139,3.498342e-7,0.000001280321,0.00001341798,0.0005950127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5133185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6882326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03715848975353744,"score_gpt":0.3126809477111601,"score_spread":0.2755224579576226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}