{"id":"W2041414609","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.05.001","title":"A mixed methods evaluation of televised health promotion advertisements targeted at older adults","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Credibility; Advertising; Recall; Health promotion; Focus group; Psychology; Population; Consumption (sociology); Qualitative research; Government (linguistics); Source credibility; Promotion (chess); Public health; Medicine; Marketing; Environmental health; Business; Political science; Nursing; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006219268,0.0001446159,0.0002313282,0.0001727096,0.0001987275,0.00001883569,0.00006622863,0.0001151621,0.001942154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001446914,0.0001401552,0.00007364809,0.0002726206,0.00002890789,0.0001254494,0.0000152174,0.0001309034,0.00001672168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001716453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001141448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006861821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001384286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960698,0.001989264,0.0006395713,0.00034818,0.0006410409,0.0003121754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998677,0.00003791946,0.0004251249,0.0002012309,0.0005032712,0.0001554763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001414203,0.0007371455,0.004459624,0.00003407164,0.00001968372,2.45651e-7,0.003444746,0.00002283778,0.0001013546,0.00005015848,0.00169839,0.9892903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00450647,0.002560738,0.949688,0.0005639927,0.0001541151,0.000006813729,0.000805181,0.04049858,0.0002368512,0.0002169587,0.0006068945,0.0001554311],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869623,0.005474268,0.001459871,0.0005938422,0.0006087763,0.003738055,0.00001145355,0.0001049512,0.00104649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868655,0.00001024318,0.01175555,0.0001455006,0.00004180598,0.0005715698,0.000485147,0.00001092803,0.0001137482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.235724611060932,"score_gpt":0.5761175877544217,"score_spread":0.3403929766934897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}