{"id":"W2041587568","doi":"10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.10.004","title":"Multifractal analysis of diversity scaling laws in a subtropical forest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Complexity","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; Key Technologies Research and Development Program; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of British Columbia; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Multifractal system; Scaling; Subtropics; Diversity (politics); Scaling law; Mathematics; Geography; Statistical physics; Ecology; Fractal; Biology; Law; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Geometry; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008672531,0.0001472897,0.0002897669,0.001532056,0.0004826266,0.0007394471,0.0004971137,0.0002991653,0.0007736554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004491983,0.000163279,0.0003584129,0.0007883463,0.0007189576,0.0008039366,0.0004046994,0.000432873,0.00005342954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006758503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002639025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008007819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006483138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998438,0.00006199828,0.000006652735,0.00002658182,0.00003323118,0.00002758963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969886,0.001968081,0.0004319274,0.0002037875,0.0002301744,0.0001774069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000349496,0.0002745953,0.1925525,0.0001534879,0.0004051165,0.0007682329,0.002474525,0.5340944,0.03058551,0.1737352,0.001311169,0.0632959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005829228,0.00001541636,0.06866981,0.000004367052,0.00002135332,0.00008903167,0.0001655205,0.9120885,0.0002284641,0.01853521,0.0001616759,0.00001476379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855011,0.0001253027,0.01374783,0.00008368992,0.00000225401,0.00000331483,0.00002797071,0.00001919213,0.000489251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998275,0.0000430773,0.001521245,0.000007131243,0.000008115046,0.000002949087,0.00002063505,0.000005930292,0.000115735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008007819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01592243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1087697488600754,"score_gpt":0.271553378261042,"score_spread":0.1627836294009666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}