{"id":"W2041587568","doi":"10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.10.004","title":"Multifractal analysis of diversity scaling laws in a subtropical forest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Complexity","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; Key Technologies Research and Development Program; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of British Columbia; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Multifractal system; Scaling; Subtropics; Diversity (politics); Scaling law; Mathematics; Geography; Statistical physics; Ecology; Fractal; Biology; Law; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Geometry; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002196301,0.00007435044,0.0002595231,0.00005830314,0.0001736451,0.000001955721,0.0001840433,0.00008006116,0.003920205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001210907,0.00006195725,0.0001027858,0.0004159013,0.0005963405,0.00006422822,0.0007444022,0.0001266056,0.00005648941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007940845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002075351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001237775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07965175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992105,0.00009781258,0.0002008082,0.0002087152,0.0001001615,0.0001819564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996208,0.000149524,0.00007736532,0.00009901946,0.000008302674,0.00004499199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003296475,0.0003775304,0.9949585,0.000001449515,0.00005601916,0.000009445969,0.0005512593,0.0007332334,0.00001386691,0.003136275,0.000008164436,0.0001212509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000173802,0.00006558553,0.9520792,6.155548e-7,0.00006104923,2.691493e-7,0.00007009993,0.03679002,0.000006460672,0.01068078,0.000004951347,0.00006718092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904979,0.000002670608,0.0004857653,0.0000477325,0.00003104187,0.00008567052,0.000004830274,0.00001625106,0.008828101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978437,0.000002923219,0.002033347,0.00008552853,0.000002823802,0.000004663456,0.000006133973,0.000001343704,0.00001951798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07841398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1087697488600754,"score_gpt":0.271553378261042,"score_spread":0.1627836294009666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}