{"id":"W2041589119","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.015","title":"A methodology for evaluating environmental planning systems: A case study of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Environmental planning; Environmental management system; Environmental resource management; Environmental design and planning; Process (computing); Environmental impact assessment; Sustainable development; Management science; Comprehensive planning; Process management; Engineering; Computer science; Land-use planning; Environmental science; Land use; Civil engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008879106,0.0009266956,0.0005228599,0.005011782,0.004872718,0.005518988,0.002466238,0.001132877,0.004126642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0162651,0.0004712521,0.0006480934,0.007826105,0.002917188,0.001735149,0.001705838,0.0009317975,0.0001994971],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03877775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03634762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8182613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9180952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937922,0.003298174,0.0002625014,0.0003822129,0.001814199,0.0004506166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905978,0.005286864,0.0005695384,0.0005430029,0.002648402,0.0003543852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004038435,0.0009697638,0.04982115,0.00131555,0.0003513315,0.001556892,0.02001757,0.3264831,0.006608244,0.1371221,0.009205809,0.4461446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003535229,0.001121157,0.03383659,0.000957022,0.0006043512,0.0009549342,0.04553813,0.7711948,0.01116954,0.05634538,0.0776021,0.0003225125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5435784,0.001548177,0.3295026,0.002691316,0.00006073487,0.00476472,0.002083432,0.0006425143,0.1151282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5628384,0.0006280622,0.4308118,0.00007361673,0.000006269434,0.0006100425,0.0004253954,0.00008193436,0.004524425],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9612222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3656181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06059742820400597,"score_gpt":0.3559668283879211,"score_spread":0.2953694001839151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}