{"id":"W2041589119","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.015","title":"A methodology for evaluating environmental planning systems: A case study of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Environmental planning; Environmental management system; Environmental resource management; Environmental design and planning; Process (computing); Environmental impact assessment; Sustainable development; Management science; Comprehensive planning; Process management; Engineering; Computer science; Land-use planning; Environmental science; Land use; Civil engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001532088,0.0003048706,0.0005230205,0.00008858172,0.0002796042,0.00002623355,0.0004095839,0.00008560849,0.00068375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000288385,0.0002768218,0.0001500931,0.00008344066,0.0001818753,0.0002819784,0.0004152466,0.0003503259,0.000005445919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007369533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002225413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01217715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006698702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968886,0.0002613068,0.001032899,0.0003329646,0.001030451,0.0004538149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981894,0.00023643,0.0009971299,0.0003271236,0.000002669729,0.0002472842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000766305,0.00864268,0.6101408,0.0001801995,0.001882167,0.008328731,0.01240968,0.03948054,0.2813959,0.00006842144,0.00262654,0.03407805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01438204,0.009434897,0.603837,0.000107775,0.00176009,0.007275585,0.3483035,0.003192357,0.002917986,0.0004357596,0.006756873,0.001596157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966416,0.00007359627,0.0005437803,0.0000267086,0.0008363245,0.001154163,0.00004058922,0.0000051653,0.0006781175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917297,0.00001304785,0.007497271,0.00007258243,0.0000927115,0.00005261487,0.000003773592,0.00003801294,0.0005002705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3358938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06059742820400597,"score_gpt":0.3559668283879211,"score_spread":0.2953694001839151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}