{"id":"W2041670710","doi":"10.1109/dasc.2011.141","title":"Finding Strong Groups of Friends among Friends in Social Networks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Friendship; Popularity; Casual; Social media; Internet privacy; Social network (sociolinguistics); World Wide Web; Interdependence; Computer science; Face (sociological concept); Social group; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002098788,0.0001465045,0.0002960405,0.0001512243,0.00008044564,0.00001493201,0.0002280732,0.00005533506,0.003006389],"category_scores_gemma":[7.230182e-7,0.0001442681,0.0001648536,0.0004528928,0.00007860149,0.0001456767,0.0001290718,0.0001999511,0.000002528696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001784234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001214351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001096001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001646347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998931,0.0000475977,0.0003657214,0.0002171848,0.000119641,0.0003188849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995431,0.00003032279,0.0001585528,0.0001906813,0.00003429954,0.0000429949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008092571,0.00009963704,0.8220504,0.000001835382,0.00008157224,8.701704e-7,0.0006361525,0.0001070798,0.00001906921,0.1707013,0.0006772055,0.005616829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008111282,0.0001063391,0.881184,0.00005651814,0.0001769247,2.330841e-7,0.003336137,0.07577971,0.002287431,0.03530771,0.0002466284,0.0007072267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.573308,0.00001102926,0.1978518,0.000005211672,0.00003935601,0.00009042689,0.000003124378,0.00006067433,0.2286303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997615,5.966392e-7,0.00187691,0.000004887383,0.0002695748,0.00002080622,0.00002026735,0.00001653891,0.0001754017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.424307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03029972686551392,"score_gpt":0.2673251478918135,"score_spread":0.2370254210262996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}