{"id":"W2041710744","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2010.05.014","title":"Reevaluating Positive Affect in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychiatry Research","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Scale (ratio); Clinical psychology; Psychopathology; Depression (economics); Test validity; Psychometrics; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychiatry; Depressive symptoms; Anxiety; Cartography; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01592412,0.0001868927,0.0003159261,0.0002254575,0.0005731222,0.00005480624,0.0006712422,0.0002296745,0.0002328772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001438376,0.0001181913,0.0001525364,0.0004654437,0.0002672289,0.00009106992,0.0001553496,0.001579903,0.0002349751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003710765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005979982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001408014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005081852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949473,0.002554611,0.0004048242,0.0006646856,0.0004543379,0.0009743015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942845,0.004542885,0.00009208598,0.0007352803,0.0002576238,0.00008762899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006141287,0.0006636722,0.8808676,0.00008582749,0.0001050614,0.000009424944,0.008927305,0.00000951499,0.001139456,0.006379353,0.07622088,0.02497776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003864562,0.001238304,0.9175619,0.0003201242,0.00004076959,0.00006400234,0.02121294,0.0008450026,0.00009676553,0.05027495,0.004047597,0.0004330816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9238919,0.001235782,0.000103699,0.008963053,0.002847035,0.001727857,0.00001961435,0.00003930111,0.06117173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934438,0.00006734404,0.002975295,0.0008374649,0.001207421,0.0006603317,0.00002100374,0.00003514032,0.0007521745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07217328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.686398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1801162350658778,"score_gpt":0.5409061671792564,"score_spread":0.3607899321133786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}