{"id":"W2041718604","doi":"10.1007/s10107-013-0667-7","title":"Enhanced Karush–Kuhn–Tucker condition and weaker constraint qualifications","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Optimization and Variational Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Subderivative; Mathematics; Lipschitz continuity; Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions; Constraint (computer-aided design); Bellman equation; Normality; Function (biology); Initial value problem; Value (mathematics); Applied mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical analysis; Convex optimization; Regular polygon","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005466954,0.001097719,0.002121852,0.001509501,0.001261305,0.002491772,0.002862229,0.00323056,0.02412197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01603518,0.000822823,0.001549959,0.001500788,0.003519185,0.008792704,0.003697218,0.005938457,0.001651393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001869272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002203358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002681155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001879981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971429,0.001124402,0.0001671329,0.0006102041,0.0006360026,0.000319409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934053,0.00365854,0.0006337159,0.000760803,0.001095516,0.0004460701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069881,0.00004797362,0.000140163,0.0001469123,0.00001869261,0.0001487535,0.0001087245,0.01686569,0.001606823,0.9700742,0.004005265,0.00676694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005454846,0.00004828078,0.0003901313,0.00003049114,0.00001418264,0.0001280464,0.00004961113,0.1561903,0.0009474918,0.8361974,0.005909401,0.00004012991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04696089,0.001144337,0.8744149,0.005614507,0.0008039668,0.0001299908,0.0008063167,0.0001598402,0.06996535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7526321,0.001558679,0.167271,0.002607183,0.001482764,0.0004741072,0.001144846,0.000398132,0.07243129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02412197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08069605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01623019121794233,"score_gpt":0.2659731881360277,"score_spread":0.2497429969180854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}