{"id":"W2041743279","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.006","title":"Forest structural attributes after windthrow and consequences of salvage logging","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Université Laval","keywords":"Salvage logging; Windthrow; Snag; Logging; Coarse woody debris; Environmental science; Disturbance (geology); Forest ecology; Forest management; Ecosystem; Forester; Ecology; Agroforestry; Forestry; Geology; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006580041,0.0002544425,0.0003079186,0.0009462901,0.0006885179,0.0007046537,0.0004534841,0.0006169433,0.003130802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002759686,0.0001355249,0.0005735338,0.0008355583,0.0007199335,0.0008004035,0.0004625224,0.0006173736,0.0003319903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005178546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003918546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00945068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0370713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996256,0.00006291531,0.00003540053,0.00004938933,0.00004239734,0.000184309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977209,0.000425036,0.0008433766,0.0001222284,0.0002110437,0.0006774411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001763722,0.000514547,0.9901795,0.0000123772,0.00007426094,0.0009989515,0.0002216153,0.0003801601,0.001013725,0.0000888848,0.0001290777,0.004623095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004728472,0.0002098309,0.9989849,0.000002076897,0.00001232306,0.0002484625,0.0002717332,0.0000768932,0.00007055719,0.00005626233,0.00005828871,0.000003902613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995951,0.00006659836,0.000009912065,0.00002196076,0.000004418633,0.000002488268,0.00007945015,9.222972e-7,0.0002191544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995968,0.00003809228,0.000007486557,0.00000760631,0.000006075335,0.000001033867,0.0001383298,7.315122e-7,0.0002038292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00945068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01879132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01499267810224778,"score_gpt":0.202658957105888,"score_spread":0.1876662790036403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}