{"id":"W2041777542","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2006.05.003","title":"The contribution of qualitative analyses of occupational health and safety interventions: An example through a study of external advisory interventions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Safety Science","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Occupational safety and health; Advisory committee; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Injury prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Qualitative research; Environmental health; Medicine; Nursing; Political science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01101403,0.0001188926,0.0004409813,0.0002376289,0.002189432,0.000008256489,0.0004089047,0.00005089566,0.0000726025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001303123,0.00008665022,0.0001446325,0.001119911,0.001159955,0.0005159996,0.0002196069,0.0002875531,0.000002809386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000207834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001881682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02670227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01068292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934054,0.002567864,0.002168794,0.0003455806,0.001014868,0.0004975083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935354,0.002910241,0.001317672,0.0003970381,0.001681931,0.000157737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00772358,0.004677239,0.4638393,0.002522491,0.00009738176,7.638529e-7,0.07993393,0.0005307721,0.001980224,0.4258201,0.0001254863,0.01274874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001563301,0.001822954,0.9334884,0.0008901544,0.00001655999,6.943403e-7,0.05465307,0.0003935698,0.00007004489,0.00691674,0.0001104753,0.0000739816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466152,0.002351928,0.04715686,0.0005453845,0.0002450281,0.002370995,0.0002983326,0.00001714093,0.0003990947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982362,0.0002173511,0.001238603,0.00003431634,0.00003991372,0.00008647719,0.00006701755,0.000005857519,0.00007429013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4696492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4804231154695673,"score_gpt":0.637886411455252,"score_spread":0.1574632959856847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}