{"id":"W2041946515","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.02.003","title":"Strengthening the reporting of Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Multidisciplinary approach; Transparency (behavior); Risk assessment; Strengths and weaknesses; Medicine; Completeness (order theory); Quality (philosophy); Public health; Disease; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Data science; Computer science; Psychology; Pathology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6791331,0.006711844,0.01134386,0.01368332,0.002718032,0.01034671,0.01122062,0.01711155,0.004836345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9109416,0.006162888,0.01560906,0.01478364,0.01296301,0.02013432,0.01379064,0.02207314,0.001132368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005493339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0151498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00419908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004451512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1724288,0.4859271,0.2770749,0.01971911,0.04271135,0.00213869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03288123,0.8252639,0.0611841,0.04903436,0.03070099,0.0009355112],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005670835,0.0002948071,0.02584423,0.2516093,0.06883503,0.001285478,0.01055911,0.00866045,0.003188486,0.1438044,0.1691728,0.3110752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007353321,0.001388084,0.02148912,0.170463,0.06734431,0.00242473,0.002060024,0.02957105,0.008843753,0.5237073,0.1633738,0.001981508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009172985,0.106489,0.4828982,0.3496622,0.02908542,0.008030144,0.008170295,0.001964137,0.004527615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1558924,0.03424011,0.6512508,0.115301,0.0243239,0.01506027,0.00229199,0.0006154339,0.001024061],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3208669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3956861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9582810679607515,"score_gpt":0.6812285641825064,"score_spread":0.2770525037782451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}