{"id":"W2041947776","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.014","title":"Infants’ perception of actions and situational constraints: An eye-tracking study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; St. Francis Xavier University","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Action (physics); Situational ethics; Perception; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Eye tracking; Imitation; Eye movement; Cognition; Pupillometry; Visual perception; Constraint learning; Constraint satisfaction; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Social psychology; Pupil; Constraint logic programming; Mathematics; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000316088,0.0001452772,0.0002875736,0.0002196212,0.0001193473,0.00002736515,0.0001475635,0.00009197331,0.006366368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002181628,0.0001279608,0.00007569298,0.00009334953,0.0002140579,0.0002789478,0.00002798208,0.0003438223,0.00005081064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003107842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002170698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002753327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002006987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985976,0.0001963513,0.0005929524,0.0002394196,0.000196122,0.0001775921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991488,0.00004271861,0.0004084535,0.0001580449,0.0001193982,0.0001225221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006249957,0.008764692,0.6139603,0.00000661256,0.0006526194,0.00004323752,0.06450696,0.000006917121,0.2731533,0.003670453,0.002166798,0.03244304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00189777,0.00197113,0.9664975,0.00002645497,0.00001988372,0.0005444814,0.02824209,0.000002023059,0.0002127546,0.00006981072,0.0003972438,0.0001188035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817413,0.0003043143,0.00007980879,0.0004776017,0.0006761775,0.0002337589,0.000002538501,0.00001156763,0.01647292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984705,0.00001281982,0.0007371058,0.00043949,0.0002657507,0.000009780058,0.000004417891,0.0000151724,0.00004490968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3525372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03766631684045305,"score_gpt":0.4012507603812458,"score_spread":0.3635844435407927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}