{"id":"W2042148947","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2003.12.014","title":"Conservation value of agricultural riparian strips in the Boyer River watershed, Québec (Canada)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; Watershed; Hydrology (agriculture); Value (mathematics); Agriculture; Environmental science; Geography; Geology; Archaeology; Ecology; Habitat; Mathematics; Computer science; Geotechnical engineering; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003439632,0.0001360171,0.0002872298,0.001040217,0.002283148,0.001482015,0.0009071291,0.0003140545,0.002750528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001553936,0.0001356398,0.0001796934,0.002874101,0.001021642,0.000291998,0.0005452321,0.0003070248,0.0001227512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02570838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01820055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999669,0.00005993635,0.00001200261,0.00005083968,0.00009904496,0.0001092432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990184,0.0001174784,0.0001459291,0.00002964382,0.0004256739,0.0002629187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004792759,0.0001140731,0.9091024,0.0001640548,0.000226371,0.00065981,0.002588484,0.005768348,0.001563841,0.002386994,0.0103542,0.06659219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001432879,0.00001569828,0.9941017,0.00004558513,0.0000252936,0.00004446677,0.001848037,0.001216758,0.00007069681,0.0001163167,0.002490449,0.00001071963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907529,0.0007437679,0.0001031981,0.0005932397,0.000008340663,0.00002784647,0.002085468,0.00001198579,0.005673165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996181,0.0002109013,0.0001915251,0.00007585189,0.000002354507,0.00000894003,0.0005477652,0.000003707623,0.002778033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02570838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1865282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004343188097447887,"score_gpt":0.1602695796876895,"score_spread":0.1559263915902417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}