{"id":"W2042239147","doi":"10.1002/hyp.1349","title":"Spring flood analysis using the flood‐duration–frequency approach: application to the provinces of Quebec and Ontario, Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Processes","topic":"Hydrology and Drought Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Flood myth; Duration (music); 100-year flood; Return period; Homogeneous; Hydrology (agriculture); Frequency analysis; Environmental science; Spring (device); Physical geography; Geography; Statistics; Geology; Mathematics; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005699443,0.0005024684,0.0003193357,0.001199606,0.00154882,0.000952253,0.0009227339,0.0003528955,0.002078885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002205642,0.0001835265,0.0005106296,0.002519879,0.0005256527,0.0002714143,0.0003867876,0.000301754,0.0001357505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03188726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01596408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997578,0.0000510937,0.00001144947,0.00003833419,0.0000602803,0.00008095288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990253,0.000346978,0.00008762602,0.00004725086,0.0003779206,0.0001149467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004333037,0.0001780124,0.5607739,0.0002652043,0.0003106887,0.0009179568,0.001404651,0.3368064,0.002644845,0.003591847,0.00766828,0.08500478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009153711,0.00006365358,0.5594517,0.00004482221,0.00008134501,0.0001130595,0.002075448,0.4289176,0.001063668,0.0008885874,0.007124866,0.00008367552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864797,0.0003392904,0.004281687,0.0003327809,0.000009075225,0.0001191998,0.004135848,0.0002102622,0.004092207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227,0.0002001229,0.003742284,0.00002481846,0.000003897138,0.00002977374,0.001562473,0.00002032493,0.002146337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03188726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2313593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01135201146985155,"score_gpt":0.206067486093272,"score_spread":0.1947154746234205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}