{"id":"W2042339292","doi":"10.1177/0022219414559974","title":"In Search of Matthew Effects in Reading","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretability; Psychology; Reading (process); Literacy; Developmental psychology; Reading comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Longitudinal data; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01665009,0.0004453931,0.0007939289,0.001746894,0.0008313531,0.001785548,0.001130591,0.0009988791,0.0065654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07850908,0.0002851248,0.001126048,0.001128242,0.004884063,0.004006037,0.003710789,0.002334538,0.0003206475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007500552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008987915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003664844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003699065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925981,0.003362711,0.0003449468,0.002346341,0.001094198,0.0002538396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8713368,0.1020513,0.01119716,0.01153621,0.002499237,0.001379427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002329047,0.0002733614,0.6273991,0.0006941208,0.001235812,0.0009350211,0.01075619,0.003673123,0.005441088,0.2356184,0.002614635,0.10903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001358742,0.001189688,0.8006069,0.0002468965,0.0008060685,0.0007200241,0.003017037,0.0104922,0.004424053,0.1700271,0.008222819,0.0001113008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9076614,0.004049719,0.04962964,0.005345022,0.000401175,0.0001318798,0.000469252,0.0002451683,0.03206665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993299,0.0002002182,0.003935111,0.0003505099,0.0001470708,0.00005156735,0.0001047707,0.00004177493,0.001869901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01665009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08805519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.016375251526756,"score_gpt":0.3265550012921795,"score_spread":0.3101797497654235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}