{"id":"W2042339292","doi":"10.1177/0022219414559974","title":"In Search of Matthew Effects in Reading","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretability; Psychology; Reading (process); Literacy; Developmental psychology; Reading comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Longitudinal data; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002266628,0.00008524676,0.0003385521,0.000326934,0.00001906824,0.00001550539,0.0001391308,0.00005816662,0.0002457477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001085949,0.00007098024,0.00006802621,0.0001737589,0.00008390329,0.0001180707,0.00002222407,0.000491621,0.0000266717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008822211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002886429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001164198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005072243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998233,0.0006658254,0.0005792601,0.0001028772,0.0002015793,0.000217508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977324,0.001879175,0.0001819596,0.0001103461,0.00005272823,0.00004341908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001399396,0.0001437611,0.9126869,0.0002066303,0.00002326869,0.00001653225,0.07146158,0.0009669318,0.0003931556,0.006196368,0.0002700085,0.007494966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002273001,0.001060743,0.9373541,0.001738583,0.00001341795,0.0001332869,0.04020049,0.0002487328,0.0008191745,0.004677161,0.0112321,0.0002492234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901671,0.0001423265,0.0001243859,0.0002598461,0.0003656377,0.00005338439,1.387657e-7,0.000004711325,0.008882508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961664,0.000007067689,0.0004713773,0.00002767509,0.00008739081,0.000003069044,3.017269e-7,0.00001175354,0.003224961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03126109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.289449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.016375251526756,"score_gpt":0.3265550012921795,"score_spread":0.3101797497654235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}