{"id":"W2042362451","doi":"10.1093/rfs/hhm076","title":"The Effect of Introducing a Non-Redundant Derivative on the Volatility of Stock-Market Returns When Agents Differ in Risk Aversion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Financial Studies","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Financial economics; Economics; Stock (firearms); Risk aversion (psychology); Derivative (finance); Stock market; Actuarial science; Monetary economics; Econometrics; Engineering; History; Expected utility hypothesis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005307617,0.0001988209,0.001022823,0.00008456718,0.0001827463,0.000006238241,0.0002660435,0.00005518098,0.00003531419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006009976,0.0001154674,0.0002295048,0.0003334515,0.0003424509,0.0000772038,0.0001280552,0.0001988317,0.000002992609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001018229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000240723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002579538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000142627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980717,0.0001416442,0.001170281,0.0002670855,0.0001020701,0.0002471923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970018,0.001287613,0.001213201,0.0003871018,0.00009073434,0.00001950438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001530336,0.000363002,0.8041641,0.01677864,0.0005196558,0.000005133025,0.006630688,0.000007932187,0.0000794049,0.06196451,0.04224839,0.06570819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004329877,0.0007342586,0.9763093,0.004188601,0.00003681047,1.679213e-7,0.0001179166,0.00007254307,0.0007564944,0.006636926,0.01056609,0.0001478887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9008648,0.09301347,0.00004711961,0.0004670521,0.0002986247,0.0009641703,0.00007739782,0.000003420671,0.004263964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87897,0.1207423,0.00004521854,0.00009580048,0.00004973967,0.00003037679,0.000001451178,0.000008247992,0.0000568853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1721452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7194937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02886847814461518,"score_gpt":0.270689887575856,"score_spread":0.2418214094312408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}