{"id":"W2042486171","doi":"10.1139/x07-041","title":"Testing the performance of a forest ecosystem model (FORECAST) against 29 years of field data in a<i>Pseudotsuga menziesii</i>plantation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Understory; Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); Calibration; Thinning; Forest inventory; Experimental forest; Douglas fir; Forest ecology; Diameter at breast height; Site index; Forestry; Tree allometry; Forest management; Ecosystem; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Agroforestry; Geography; Canopy; Biomass partitioning; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005502596,0.00008253539,0.0001788658,0.0003978155,0.0001444058,0.00001912419,0.001083454,0.00007756591,0.00005520393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006568828,0.000067487,0.00003306704,0.0006429598,0.0002937561,0.0003215883,0.0001845643,0.0004373634,0.00001242558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002549459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003851719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.648554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982137,0.00009169442,0.000546698,0.0001568901,0.0004856199,0.0005054119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985087,0.0005415581,0.0002424855,0.0004149837,0.00008211099,0.00021015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007280678,0.00002566203,0.9118172,0.00006942998,0.00001617202,0.0001132232,0.0005233843,0.07942681,0.0001658686,0.0006387561,0.001981611,0.005149087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004064006,0.0003979176,0.9365972,0.0002038547,0.000009717345,0.00004100617,0.0004282643,0.05991621,0.0003515273,0.0007364896,0.0008255864,0.00008588692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931065,0.00004957094,0.0002108959,0.0001586189,0.00006570756,0.0002502771,0.00001566294,0.000001418291,0.006141329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991462,0.00004312808,0.0006393017,0.00005070314,0.0000320702,0.000003143926,0.000006312399,0.00000932139,0.0000698649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6377872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06695727940496427,"score_gpt":0.2965358198285121,"score_spread":0.2295785404235479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}