{"id":"W2042556403","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.12.006","title":"Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Weighting; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Extension (predicate logic); A priori and a posteriori; Efficiency; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Rank (graph theory); Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04247901,0.002978146,0.003039622,0.006515054,0.001889136,0.007903975,0.002306703,0.002872547,0.00435462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05108554,0.0008643281,0.002804032,0.005416399,0.00214836,0.00510007,0.00522427,0.003233772,0.0009089797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002676183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003751585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001407325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002019213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9699988,0.02135178,0.001398511,0.001175569,0.004838727,0.00123664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572434,0.02581241,0.001809509,0.004178834,0.01028334,0.0006725359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001307669,0.0009910637,0.005527878,0.0009118708,0.0006349634,0.0001600147,0.0008265987,0.182542,0.005807538,0.640132,0.002168687,0.1589898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001645229,0.0006810956,0.003684325,0.0006031765,0.0003808371,0.0001950636,0.0006087618,0.5918557,0.02031104,0.3735841,0.007790591,0.0001407302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03379888,0.0004618764,0.949048,0.0004000084,0.00004466129,0.0003119504,0.0001557238,0.0001344163,0.01564441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5005376,0.0003943648,0.4912117,0.0003507023,0.00005669427,0.001443258,0.000498721,0.0002860302,0.005220902],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04247901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2246531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1249228578045432,"score_gpt":0.4240274807656277,"score_spread":0.2991046229610845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}