{"id":"W2042580824","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.011","title":"Using expert judgments to understand spatial patterns of forest-based camping: A values-at-risk application","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Hazard; Prioritization; Geography; Fire prevention; Environmental planning; Risk management; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Forestry; Business; Ecology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004505644,0.000661671,0.0005276253,0.003027631,0.0005014273,0.001504301,0.001001347,0.001450378,0.003219318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0480594,0.0003280337,0.000541907,0.001941893,0.0008229265,0.002783648,0.0007712932,0.0007695851,0.0002863671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008540298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006135119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01464198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01649971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983678,0.000729082,0.0001117149,0.0003285118,0.0003581631,0.0001047197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599106,0.0338584,0.002119666,0.001374103,0.002058974,0.0006782174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002347751,0.0009302727,0.4340529,0.0003462922,0.0006434194,0.00110538,0.006903825,0.2373057,0.005138306,0.01903271,0.004265031,0.2879284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008688467,0.0002172451,0.08891132,0.00005798943,0.00009139573,0.0002235554,0.003198809,0.8547129,0.00191126,0.04962341,0.0008734284,0.00009174155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8877965,0.0001480844,0.1043735,0.0002717004,0.0000179351,0.00008438457,0.0004764022,0.0001095254,0.006721995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826006,0.00004604121,0.01687329,0.00002325367,0.000008588545,0.00002026582,0.0001593439,0.00001109521,0.000257603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01464198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02911347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0568316865218723,"score_gpt":0.2196306782351917,"score_spread":0.1627989917133194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}