{"id":"W2042654193","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2010.07.005","title":"A Jonckheere–Terpstra-type test for perfect ranking in balanced ranked set sampling","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Ranking (information retrieval); Nonparametric statistics; Statistics; RSS; Statistic; Test statistic; Sampling (signal processing); Type I and type II errors; Type (biology); Test (biology); Set (abstract data type); Statistical hypothesis testing; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07772721,0.001346334,0.005857642,0.005031633,0.003544817,0.004569006,0.008256274,0.005098026,0.0240442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3144613,0.00136954,0.004066755,0.006018208,0.007321378,0.01087004,0.005159572,0.005183434,0.002671903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00214791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007325274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003461282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003538283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9219165,0.04858895,0.004506445,0.01013513,0.0115929,0.003259987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7048036,0.2493577,0.006093998,0.02690535,0.009741568,0.003097777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005128011,0.001129593,0.04098469,0.001069682,0.002203297,0.001090791,0.000880224,0.05974785,0.003163123,0.5625615,0.01927314,0.3027681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001688336,0.003330678,0.0167461,0.0002703572,0.0008290028,0.00130933,0.0007719112,0.386245,0.003752777,0.5745828,0.01022771,0.0002460072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.06726847,0.0007096622,0.9185014,0.001794859,0.0004692778,0.0007546538,0.001454194,0.0005857257,0.008461844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6349968,0.0004149957,0.3491316,0.001037707,0.0007043001,0.001669784,0.003238044,0.00025921,0.008547691],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07772721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4110657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1232962016839542,"score_gpt":0.4428703394002491,"score_spread":0.3195741377162948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}