{"id":"W2042708466","doi":"10.1007/s10982-005-5881-x","title":"Civic Liberalism and the “Dialogical Model” of Judicial Review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Liberalism; Philosophy of law; Epistemology; Indeterminate; Dialogical self; Distributive justice; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Injustice; Distributive property; Political science; Classical liberalism; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Public law; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002464607,0.00005216747,0.0001681218,0.000005584135,0.0004850588,0.00001160216,0.00005621805,0.00003167197,0.00001201837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002042174,0.00003144503,0.00004062583,0.00006268868,0.00200773,0.00004419286,0.00003539877,0.000047863,0.000001739237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003609662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002093818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008027148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001146811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994851,0.00006989914,0.0001195448,0.00008755633,0.000150177,0.00008767983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997802,0.00008265134,0.00003853526,0.00003926804,0.00003439294,0.00002494315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001115157,0.000009976226,0.00008934994,0.00001598468,0.00000564077,3.78837e-7,0.0001969686,0.000001352352,0.000001847271,0.9991889,0.0003120159,0.0001664605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001906974,0.000007988868,0.0001517431,0.00007657283,0.00002861968,3.984266e-7,0.000007981825,0.000007702283,0.000001213825,0.978981,0.0205017,0.00004443446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005623432,0.03533829,0.00001529233,0.03814578,0.00006390332,0.0001846916,0.00001173872,0.00001456878,0.9206023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859444,0.008277659,0.00002354299,0.005209898,0.000496197,0.000008140225,0.000001275754,0.000001383148,0.00003749394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03383339682363405,"score_gpt":0.2674164756806118,"score_spread":0.2335830788569777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}