{"id":"W2042710141","doi":"10.5121/ijsea.2010.1204","title":"Contributors Preference in Open Source Software Usability: An Empirical Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Computer science; Empirical research; Quality (philosophy); Software; Set (abstract data type); Open source software; Open source; Key (lock); Perspective (graphical); World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Human–computer interaction; Computer security; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001285074,0.0002343723,0.0003448283,0.0005644546,0.0001075869,0.0007508968,0.005765727,0.0001210442,0.00004316725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001905534,0.0002364022,0.00008934028,0.0009755185,0.00005657562,0.001969909,0.0008793185,0.0009646733,0.00002355996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002073706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003657322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007590299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009621411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973941,0.00006368252,0.001015857,0.0004550295,0.000778705,0.0002926223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963818,0.0007073356,0.0004290965,0.0008437355,0.001418977,0.0002190779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002904864,0.002356983,0.9160187,0.00000959684,0.0001596454,0.00004340411,0.002334314,0.01254798,0.0005613667,0.005175652,0.0002801247,0.06048324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002933154,0.0004632927,0.9128699,0.0001015398,0.00003774414,0.0004315304,0.0003578621,0.007399355,0.0004164037,0.004576226,0.069563,0.000850009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3492981,0.00001007031,0.6489941,0.0004673418,0.0005258344,0.0005248407,0.00001441297,0.000154041,0.00001120841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7589069,0.000001609911,0.2404532,0.0001349826,0.0002540754,0.0001801485,0.0000108669,0.00002574857,0.000032473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4096088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02540234014004828,"score_gpt":0.3226644805807901,"score_spread":0.2972621404407418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}