{"id":"W2042890048","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.05.002","title":"Adopting alternatives for the regulatory monitoring of shellfish for paralytic shellfish poisoning in Canada: Interface between federal regulators, science and ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Marine Toxins and Detection Methods","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Council on Animal Care","funders":"","keywords":"Shellfish; Paralytic shellfish poisoning; Bioassay; Saxitoxin; Shellfish poisoning; CITES; Sample (material); Toxicology; Risk analysis (engineering); Biology; Chromatography; Biotechnology; Fishery; Business; Chemistry; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Toxin; Aquatic animal","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00302027,0.0001967425,0.0003664726,0.00009804707,0.0005945607,0.00002292468,0.0003096033,0.0001661467,0.00005406596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003051781,0.0001709539,0.00004039724,0.0002551143,0.000972595,0.0001936933,0.0001869786,0.0003976064,1.692428e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004878472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003770929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004812636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01025245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981074,0.0002155525,0.0004372817,0.000498749,0.0002490392,0.0004920044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975505,0.00183924,0.0002388841,0.0001716079,0.00005590633,0.0001437889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004856431,0.00008017778,0.5885437,0.0001468548,0.00008273128,0.00000493444,0.001565497,0.00716597,0.2242126,0.0009420135,0.0011495,0.1756204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00124329,0.0003654017,0.8542203,0.00002603193,0.00006062372,0.00001667912,0.0003847339,0.00672956,0.130855,0.0007999116,0.005051895,0.0002465746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946083,0.0004109834,0.002151849,0.001530431,0.0005415998,0.0006359017,0.000007032317,0.00001529224,0.00009863914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929743,0.00006844555,0.006147974,0.0004767979,0.0001518941,0.0000462027,5.445474e-7,0.00001225377,0.0001215328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2656766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7275299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04119727205523051,"score_gpt":0.3504863737579514,"score_spread":0.3092891017027209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}