{"id":"W2042890048","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.05.002","title":"Adopting alternatives for the regulatory monitoring of shellfish for paralytic shellfish poisoning in Canada: Interface between federal regulators, science and ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Marine Toxins and Detection Methods","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Council on Animal Care","funders":"","keywords":"Shellfish; Paralytic shellfish poisoning; Bioassay; Saxitoxin; Shellfish poisoning; CITES; Sample (material); Toxicology; Risk analysis (engineering); Biology; Chromatography; Biotechnology; Fishery; Business; Chemistry; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Toxin; Aquatic animal","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09366062,0.0004637528,0.0005998662,0.003574247,0.0103545,0.01471769,0.005498899,0.01509933,0.001259951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08456823,0.0007823726,0.001256488,0.002410936,0.0181528,0.002554876,0.003532785,0.01178806,0.000177244],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07777084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2982293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.897474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9512942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8856549,0.03146029,0.006306848,0.00506089,0.06019165,0.01132547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8469381,0.06430418,0.01286509,0.004977365,0.06306856,0.007846608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006993733,0.0009333709,0.1787343,0.001234086,0.0005865237,0.002630834,0.02768782,0.0139478,0.02464212,0.4767016,0.08587717,0.1863251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006453652,0.001567557,0.3268723,0.003265539,0.000810278,0.001274748,0.03105743,0.02574295,0.02038842,0.1031137,0.483988,0.001273693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2822206,0.005142287,0.02617961,0.5357735,0.001093543,0.001953455,0.0004675481,0.0002716477,0.1468979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8542045,0.002108034,0.03275025,0.09293612,0.0003725248,0.0004116526,0.000150152,0.00005016137,0.01701681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5642696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04119727205523051,"score_gpt":0.3504863737579514,"score_spread":0.3092891017027209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}