{"id":"W2042902724","doi":"10.1065/espr2005.09.284","title":"Titration Curves: A Useful Instrument for Assessing the Buffer Systems of Acidic Mining Waters (10 pp)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","topic":"Mine drainage and remediation techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Titration; Titration curve; Chemistry; Acid–base titration; Sulfide; Inorganic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001774786,0.002356552,0.001577099,0.0033232,0.0008635815,0.0009985603,0.002160165,0.002022704,0.01971809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002169693,0.001053827,0.0007149271,0.00144288,0.0005306711,0.001821891,0.001090884,0.002553887,0.01379651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003785621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004700959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005881514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001759368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985794,0.0003049355,0.0001108242,0.0001360398,0.000795219,0.00007366151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979619,0.0009396478,0.0001797436,0.0001150339,0.0005627662,0.0002409258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009389839,0.0004598291,0.001181979,0.0008962051,0.00007996835,0.0003299085,0.0001351633,0.0002515751,0.8541572,0.0008318278,0.02540275,0.1153346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001613117,0.001370814,0.009801026,0.0001605119,0.0001982769,0.002666685,0.0001721011,0.003348067,0.8108899,0.002115641,0.1689764,0.0001393488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06960395,0.05196164,0.7604761,0.004965748,0.005136114,0.00252473,0.02131851,0.03895229,0.04506088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1161236,0.03258425,0.6777067,0.005691442,0.002197052,0.003070842,0.01654775,0.004033786,0.1420446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01971809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06596357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04448375470890706,"score_gpt":0.3341437708328885,"score_spread":0.2896600161239814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}