{"id":"W2042914215","doi":"10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04014.x","title":"A Theory‐Driven Approach to Evaluating Quality of Nursing Care","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","topic":"Nursing education and management","field":"Nursing","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Nursing; Quality (philosophy); Outcome (game theory); Nursing theory; Health care; Nursing care; Psychology; Focus (optics); Management science; MEDLINE; Medicine; Epistemology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0604932,0.001752494,0.003685256,0.01367449,0.001421365,0.006838944,0.004436532,0.001951387,0.002724525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07253311,0.0006042185,0.001688025,0.006709282,0.006008233,0.003528581,0.002857413,0.003483772,0.0007387565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01259736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02160303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004538884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007997734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9261972,0.05032276,0.003585924,0.001619849,0.01787989,0.0003943504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9297509,0.05200075,0.002863827,0.001822608,0.01298715,0.0005746799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001003294,0.000393964,0.005022686,0.03034054,0.0009731476,0.0003148617,0.004093888,0.009079622,0.0012792,0.2470154,0.01163832,0.689748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003586947,0.002071056,0.01343442,0.07121616,0.001449825,0.001676505,0.01446067,0.02577043,0.005227273,0.536406,0.3275079,0.0004211084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.009080995,0.1471274,0.7449023,0.0195876,0.002198936,0.0105333,0.0005397636,0.0003526338,0.06567709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1558735,0.08286013,0.7351687,0.004887923,0.00052779,0.01737999,0.0005513038,0.000083004,0.002667567],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0604932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3199224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3195359853601838,"score_gpt":0.5302327689443356,"score_spread":0.2106967835841518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}