{"id":"W2042918449","doi":"10.1007/s11145-012-9400-9","title":"Understanding literacy development of language minority students: an integrative approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading and Writing","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Literacy; Vocabulary; Psychology; Theme (computing); First language; Minority language; Comprehension; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Cognition; Language assessment; Psycholinguistics; Comprehension approach; Language education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001108347,0.0001781029,0.000256984,0.0001623716,0.0002123434,0.00008497247,0.0001387129,0.00008007196,0.00003667539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003096936,0.0001526672,0.0000328931,0.0001603819,0.00004919703,0.0003428843,0.00006601857,0.0001897826,0.000007924044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001285026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004979664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001121316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985568,0.0001374375,0.0004186642,0.0002650554,0.0002102971,0.0004117259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993344,0.0001539909,0.0001490967,0.0001671692,0.00003513275,0.0001602179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002871847,0.0003835688,0.4342106,0.0001095835,0.0001331177,0.000004572095,0.49649,4.009701e-7,0.0009374823,0.01531788,0.00008701577,0.05229706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002057424,0.0001691048,0.4560119,0.001457757,0.0001094209,0.000199606,0.5326255,0.0002879991,0.003442167,0.0002802183,0.002141758,0.001217171],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9557528,0.0006295939,0.01018894,0.000006327514,0.0001679085,0.0001204411,0.00000361104,0.00005917487,0.03307116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773611,0.000005649715,0.02156845,0.00003373382,0.000155991,0.00002090563,0.000033786,0.00001603645,0.0008042999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05107989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6225586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07437370830933815,"score_gpt":0.3795035977738582,"score_spread":0.30512988946452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}