{"id":"W2043098144","doi":"10.4153/cjm-2001-018-8","title":"Values of the Dedekind Eta Function at Quadratic Irrationalities: Corrigendum","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Canadian Journal of Mathematics","topic":"Rings, Modules, and Algebras","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Mathematics; Lemma (botany); Ideal (ethics); Dedekind cut; Remainder; Prime (order theory); Pure mathematics; Quadratic equation; Function (biology); Dedekind sum; Arithmetic; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Geometry; Philosophy; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001090787,0.0004666857,0.001075774,0.0004318951,0.0003864559,0.0001152239,0.0009414249,0.0005388402,0.001185453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001776073,0.0003369689,0.0006206105,0.0002975762,0.0003287283,0.0001692785,0.00005566104,0.001022822,0.00003300717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006648161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003628054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004789561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0311023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963861,0.000166738,0.00177301,0.0002123972,0.000971108,0.0004906617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994636,0.0004228782,0.002923634,0.000818668,0.0007521084,0.0004466867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005645369,0.00007137779,0.0001615673,0.001306154,0.0003466804,0.00003691406,0.003599733,0.0000122732,0.00001538834,0.03007151,0.9642935,0.00007919377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005591288,0.0002246162,0.0005155173,0.004496122,0.001329819,0.001048663,0.004442513,0.000269409,0.0001576978,0.7182643,0.2679999,0.0006923194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.3423422,0.02466165,0.0181448,0.005693007,0.263648,0.004638574,0.001487695,0.0001517384,0.3392324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04044836,0.0005357211,0.009368624,0.0006043552,0.007307864,0.00001987916,0.00008285498,0.0004360883,0.9411963],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6962937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06283527610676364,"score_gpt":0.259756174440093,"score_spread":0.1969208983333293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}