{"id":"W2043159951","doi":"10.1002/jqs.1307","title":"Some Holocene palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental perspectives on Arctic/Subarctic climate warming and the IPCC 4th Assessment Report","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quaternary Science","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Tundra; Holocene; Arctic; Woodland; Taiga; Boreal; Climatology; Climate change; Global warming; Physical geography; Holocene climatic optimum; Geology; Arctic ecology; Environmental science; Oceanography; Geography; Ecology; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003018828,0.0001849166,0.0003026719,0.0002199332,0.0005095432,0.0002726266,0.0003777783,0.00003002357,0.00004141167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002615017,0.0001070329,0.00006934566,0.0001965748,0.001234712,0.00102387,0.00004470566,0.000303125,0.000009911142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004169273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008592851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008041325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000561895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976613,0.0001827898,0.0005042945,0.0003347147,0.0008890296,0.0004278721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998471,0.0004966296,0.0005256942,0.0002365716,0.00004504667,0.0002251197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004558305,0.00007394693,0.9853082,0.00003144996,0.00002012706,0.0009605517,0.001980861,0.0005795928,0.0005242615,0.0003902456,0.000004594527,0.00967028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008195594,0.0008241476,0.9809073,0.0001595521,0.00003567474,0.006295586,0.002462679,0.006713537,0.00008788604,0.001544575,0.00001135934,0.0001381437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940589,0.001829834,0.00001609938,0.00349629,0.0002159644,0.0001409312,0.000004279557,0.00001113293,0.0002265464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945822,0.003431375,0.001550522,0.0002851275,0.0001250192,3.444374e-7,6.671767e-7,0.000003510199,0.00002123614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009532136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4549348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01377055781220789,"score_gpt":0.2660063008619238,"score_spread":0.2522357430497159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}