{"id":"W2043194157","doi":"10.1139/t02-003","title":"Towards a more rational approach to chemical compatibility testing of clay","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Soil and Unsaturated Flow","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Environment Protection Authority Victoria","keywords":"Permeameter; Compatibility (geochemistry); Hydraulic conductivity; Geotechnical engineering; Boundary value problem; Leachate; Structural engineering; Engineering; Environmental science; Materials science; Waste management; Soil water; Composite material; Soil science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005201444,0.0007593822,0.0008433323,0.002789396,0.0009655103,0.002185431,0.001928391,0.00203876,0.001236447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00695867,0.0006503174,0.000481347,0.0007326012,0.005596763,0.003245513,0.002042652,0.002169173,0.0005231614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001469258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002534886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00200235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003345528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949408,0.001447021,0.0002473465,0.0004771895,0.002731378,0.0001563954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956968,0.001205538,0.0005355424,0.0005868067,0.00181908,0.0001562476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001423464,0.0005165412,0.002786833,0.0005879843,0.00002810244,0.0004561357,0.0006085156,0.01726122,0.8229952,0.07367988,0.0004404906,0.0804968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007923902,0.001597638,0.002415899,0.0001221903,0.0000399901,0.00102593,0.000858972,0.03377201,0.9013122,0.04119787,0.01742429,0.0001538522],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1056964,0.001473811,0.8812901,0.001480172,0.00009085509,0.0005043884,0.00007797818,0.0005613727,0.008824923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2830144,0.001324048,0.7120587,0.0004789052,0.00003541719,0.0003298078,0.0001034063,0.00007145633,0.002583856],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005201444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0275082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03079825938277478,"score_gpt":0.2160244638581362,"score_spread":0.1852262044753615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}