{"id":"W2043197118","doi":"10.1142/s1464333203001310","title":"AUDITING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTICE IN CANADA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Audit; Quality (philosophy); Plan (archaeology); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Environmental resource management; Strategic planning; Process management; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental impact assessment; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Environmental science; Accounting; Geography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001052494,0.0004779008,0.0005185808,0.0001790196,0.0002574517,0.00008961344,0.0003654918,0.00008931204,0.0015933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002427175,0.00045475,0.0001327402,0.0002344811,0.0002426566,0.001012195,0.000413394,0.0005701099,0.00002595069],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007931821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002512354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04099959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01852651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957445,0.0004506505,0.001091092,0.0004841702,0.001446958,0.0007825974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982201,0.0001985877,0.000838391,0.0003033138,0.000002169391,0.0004374452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001456397,0.005168846,0.9003832,0.0001272385,0.000901991,0.00256222,0.001177336,0.006729448,0.0156033,0.01885164,0.001724203,0.0466249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003134069,0.0004598426,0.930031,0.00007124999,0.0001847024,0.0003057135,0.01787818,0.0001893728,0.0002136585,0.002699227,0.04407214,0.0007608497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8824313,0.0001986119,0.0001613077,0.0007730196,0.0002965452,0.0005710166,0.0000435953,0.000008127308,0.1155165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986433,0.003977045,0.007395174,0.001448353,0.00008856956,0.000026722,0.00001098289,0.0000425469,0.0005775723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1149389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009542760790041087,"score_gpt":0.2823979120607418,"score_spread":0.2728551512707008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}