{"id":"W2043197118","doi":"10.1142/s1464333203001310","title":"AUDITING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTICE IN CANADA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Audit; Quality (philosophy); Plan (archaeology); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Environmental resource management; Strategic planning; Process management; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental impact assessment; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Environmental science; Accounting; Geography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01221054,0.0002515645,0.0002990869,0.003372309,0.01211361,0.006257976,0.001820324,0.0008146205,0.001540465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0404214,0.0004395887,0.0002116677,0.009963024,0.005192877,0.001394129,0.003435938,0.00121215,0.0001657498],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1131501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9748569,0.004205387,0.001084213,0.001009706,0.01558258,0.00326116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9273454,0.007331915,0.003594554,0.001734323,0.05476023,0.005233463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000199584,0.0001924359,0.1350458,0.0008585692,0.00007089386,0.0007142427,0.08573489,0.01068087,0.003032754,0.03966677,0.0667761,0.657027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004455083,0.0002322258,0.4003415,0.0009660667,0.00005455027,0.0003548725,0.1797628,0.01072611,0.003276438,0.01065606,0.3932852,0.0002996353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.819047,0.0037371,0.007100611,0.03008093,0.0002631672,0.0007576965,0.0005830212,0.0003823444,0.1380482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842749,0.001487653,0.004770712,0.0007555053,0.00001037982,0.00005543007,0.0001860923,0.00002665055,0.00843275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8868499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8209649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009542760790041087,"score_gpt":0.2823979120607418,"score_spread":0.2728551512707008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}