{"id":"W2043269644","doi":"10.1016/j.jcis.2005.05.062","title":"A thermodynamic approach for determining the contact angle hysteresis for superhydrophobic surfaces","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Colloid and Interface Science","topic":"Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Contact angle; Wetting; Hysteresis; Wetting transition; Surface energy; Pillar; Surface (topology); Materials science; Condensed matter physics; Physics; Composite material; Geometry; Mechanical engineering; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002223556,0.0001532205,0.0002903936,0.0001106452,0.0005450913,0.0003640307,0.0007335459,0.00004555218,0.00003013838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002875975,0.00009214802,0.0001145026,0.0002116408,0.0004217091,0.0007743072,0.00006596299,0.00009895658,0.000003232596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002066273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006479403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007254767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985045,0.00005788671,0.0004660907,0.0002741964,0.0003572741,0.0003400404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985836,0.0003176643,0.0002897105,0.0002093597,0.0004763048,0.0001233543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001288056,0.00006488062,0.0002896884,0.00001629102,0.000005450059,3.741323e-8,0.001092619,0.0008788315,0.9967313,0.00008635054,0.0001711543,0.0005345719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00145831,0.0007021647,0.002704543,0.00004462594,0.00003652158,0.00004069804,0.001681488,0.1559954,0.8339008,0.00008433013,0.003126831,0.0002243025],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802104,0.000404437,0.01783898,0.0004709709,0.0003126245,0.0004784327,0.00002249146,0.0000126326,0.0002490339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889538,0.00002641475,0.0104921,0.0001754056,0.0000867333,0.00001920383,4.01496e-7,0.0000120991,0.0002338014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1628305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4192457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02330877554890321,"score_gpt":0.2823658882571194,"score_spread":0.2590571127082162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}