{"id":"W2043360509","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.380","title":"Estimating size and trend of the North Interlake woodland caribou population using fecal‐DNA and capture–recapture models","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Parks Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Trent University; Parks Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Threatened species; Endangered species; Population; Population size; Mark and recapture; Vital rates; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Effective population size; Demography; Population growth; Genetic variation; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002491506,0.000348436,0.0003513936,0.0007754294,0.0002617619,0.0006463176,0.0007898069,0.0004202338,0.001065789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004365958,0.0004296438,0.0005726055,0.0004759854,0.0003353835,0.0006363513,0.0004163281,0.0003995634,0.0002959433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006912532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007426423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07174151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09357301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994586,0.000211725,0.00002481546,0.0001997515,0.00005094016,0.00005408354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978691,0.001171691,0.000445241,0.0002062896,0.0002480797,0.00005953765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001007149,0.00009604308,0.7665452,0.00004238466,0.0002808505,0.0001016907,0.0002845525,0.2046699,0.001909363,0.001688209,0.0005444505,0.02373673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001451793,0.00009042299,0.154751,0.00002530169,0.00006154151,0.0001019871,0.000176224,0.8420655,0.0004466351,0.001471747,0.0007709277,0.00002420737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597638,0.0001569458,0.038574,0.0001067946,0.000007116434,0.00001984941,0.0004231351,0.0001174282,0.0008310031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853681,0.00008364041,0.01298778,0.00002220659,0.000005881182,0.00003124397,0.0007149001,0.00001929616,0.0007670844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07174151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1426479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01372893807986179,"score_gpt":0.22100504589686,"score_spread":0.2072761078169982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}