{"id":"W2043360509","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.380","title":"Estimating size and trend of the North Interlake woodland caribou population using fecal‐DNA and capture–recapture models","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Parks Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Trent University; Parks Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Threatened species; Endangered species; Population; Population size; Mark and recapture; Vital rates; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Effective population size; Demography; Population growth; Genetic variation; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003774252,0.0001008587,0.000158571,0.00003610592,0.0001192142,0.00001941786,0.0001055986,0.00004827764,0.00002495358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003164523,0.00006966835,0.0000431085,0.0001155072,0.00008238203,0.0004528498,0.0001663525,0.0001279247,3.701731e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006655668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003250026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001367873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003252984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991447,0.000069856,0.0003243535,0.00009347642,0.0002187812,0.0001488696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993653,0.00005016488,0.0004053812,0.000104013,0.000008461147,0.00006673294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002066994,0.00003765776,0.9822962,0.00002495385,0.00004373377,0.000001717608,0.0009088636,0.01385136,0.00002510394,0.00009187654,0.0005824404,0.002115399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003371838,0.00002581269,0.9849774,0.00005501727,0.0001238636,0.00004030322,0.000207279,0.01337671,0.000002871911,0.0005350759,0.0002444366,0.00007403574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997247,0.00008960486,0.001147525,0.0007214433,0.000306926,0.0001230464,0.000002683945,0.000003141819,0.0003586613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939824,0.00001300341,0.005104212,0.0007430461,0.00008636148,0.000001189177,0.000001116289,0.000006483033,0.00006221123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003956687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2840993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01372893807986179,"score_gpt":0.22100504589686,"score_spread":0.2072761078169982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}