{"id":"W2043464446","doi":"10.1190/int-2013-0038.1","title":"Synthetic core from conventional logs: A new method of interpretation for identification of key reservoir properties","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interpretation","topic":"Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Facies; Geology; Well logging; Reservoir modeling; Petrology; Coring; Porosity; Sedimentary depositional environment; Petrophysics; Mineralogy; Petroleum engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Geomorphology; Drilling; Structural basin; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003698495,0.0001144365,0.0002537695,0.0001994003,0.00002253424,0.00002309082,0.0001595655,0.00008051718,0.00004662475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004337286,0.000106394,0.000159893,0.0001654406,0.0000398814,0.0002408514,0.00001392268,0.00006108612,0.00001108687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003882471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002577873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008817911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007005949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987673,0.00008533695,0.0006742377,0.0001748553,0.0002068996,0.00009138323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990636,0.0002055188,0.0002293793,0.0002249292,0.0002350883,0.00004154924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003053902,0.00005324252,0.0001591973,0.0003995032,0.0003409642,7.867439e-8,0.008259268,0.5190614,0.4420622,0.002076878,0.0004394115,0.02684237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002802436,0.00005118846,0.0002600111,0.0001744221,0.00009354902,3.504687e-7,0.0002627163,0.8590156,0.1332922,0.006354221,0.0001274546,0.00008799617],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1173467,0.0001366499,0.881615,0.0001011017,0.0002145376,0.0002251316,0.00002721855,0.00006094468,0.0002727108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907832,0.00001300917,0.008790527,0.00001728797,0.00004421544,0.0000574641,0.0001450092,0.00002225174,0.0001270278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8734365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.433862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0252285871448517,"score_gpt":0.2825899955824283,"score_spread":0.2573614084375766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}