{"id":"W2043648653","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.072","title":"Modelling the vulnerability of balsam fir forests to wind damage","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université Laval","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Windthrow; Abies balsamea; Balsam; Canopy; Environmental science; Forestry; Abies alba; Storm; Atmospheric sciences; Geography; Ecology; Picea abies; Biology; Meteorology; Botany; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000533378,0.0005050159,0.0003475899,0.000428187,0.0004999249,0.0007591383,0.0007786519,0.001497574,0.001449379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001880605,0.0004951736,0.0004660997,0.0003560494,0.0007306147,0.000901552,0.0004950206,0.0006912493,0.00009594547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001386737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006549628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05528918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05153306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999887,0.00003212876,0.000005046185,0.00002098791,0.00001005851,0.00004483115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990484,0.0006894031,0.00009231142,0.00002814196,0.00005307322,0.00008865548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002853408,0.00003168956,0.005663867,0.000008611531,0.0000177692,0.00004271948,0.00003159769,0.9919166,0.0005206862,0.0007154348,0.0000528011,0.0009696912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006177729,0.00002411329,0.002757132,0.000002828068,0.0000112521,0.0000151333,0.0000538152,0.9959651,0.0001714511,0.0009227541,0.00006512018,0.000004960784],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941299,0.00008277116,0.003982134,0.00009075882,0.000007613578,0.000006221985,0.0000447769,0.00001404521,0.001641822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986211,0.00004165441,0.0005089228,0.000008547781,0.000003451548,0.000004343106,0.00001941682,0.000004322891,0.0007882083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05528918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1099347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01302710412149227,"score_gpt":0.2200198073346149,"score_spread":0.2069927032131226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}