{"id":"W2043712619","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01327.x","title":"ESTIMATING GENETIC CORRELATIONS FROM MEASUREMENTS OF FIELD-CAUGHT WATERSTRIDERS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Heritability; Biology; Genetic similarity; Similarity (geometry); Statistics; Sample size determination; Genetic correlation; Estimation; Field (mathematics); Sample (material); Evolutionary biology; Genetic variation; Genetics; Mathematics; Demography; Genetic diversity; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002853177,0.0005716417,0.0006954919,0.001376314,0.0004221419,0.0002401625,0.0006014879,0.0004665702,0.0005803693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01014181,0.0004165509,0.0004559129,0.0009655457,0.00046958,0.0004514632,0.0004610026,0.0006136427,0.0002220934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004195947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002889624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005570477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01284273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978314,0.001036943,0.0001141447,0.0006248704,0.0003215827,0.00007103044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955893,0.002394364,0.0007711486,0.0006604534,0.000507519,0.00007724296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004106973,0.0002493747,0.7393078,0.0001999053,0.0007701514,0.0003330611,0.001093294,0.01336342,0.1000447,0.001989002,0.0009315292,0.1413071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007360795,0.0007640006,0.9165063,0.00002676306,0.0001817103,0.0006102936,0.0001679727,0.0517408,0.02600515,0.00221199,0.001618177,0.00009323837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8441397,0.0002161815,0.1539872,0.00003709189,0.00001883469,0.0001571209,0.0005472772,0.000168355,0.0007282214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7866741,0.0001151529,0.2113866,0.00004221312,0.00001599726,0.0003389205,0.000734724,0.00003711578,0.0006551291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005570477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01508921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01845139300116284,"score_gpt":0.2190042922264062,"score_spread":0.2005528992252434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}