{"id":"W2043751502","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.014","title":"The Assessment of Pain Quality: An Item Response Theory Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pain","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Nuvo Pharmaceuticals (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Item response theory; Perspective (graphical); Medicine; Scale (ratio); Psychometrics; Computerized adaptive testing; Quality (philosophy); Clinical psychology; Physical therapy; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02564672,0.0009038562,0.001772477,0.003002124,0.001076418,0.001862706,0.001618148,0.001186159,0.002646509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06604847,0.0007031096,0.004619224,0.003137015,0.001314139,0.001805406,0.002602677,0.002254001,0.0004542693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001490042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001758286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001435202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002013982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.975866,0.01590984,0.002586704,0.0007138313,0.004524658,0.0003990596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9127932,0.07467458,0.004052272,0.001958721,0.005884477,0.0006365963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002740627,0.001807955,0.8168687,0.001964136,0.004510226,0.0003353587,0.009654136,0.008514953,0.002210848,0.003994395,0.002637713,0.144761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001345949,0.006694744,0.9049882,0.000920648,0.002004355,0.0007613945,0.01202713,0.05828116,0.002133564,0.007393306,0.003169372,0.0002801554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.948446,0.0008905529,0.04166553,0.00075952,0.0001490348,0.002939393,0.001000124,0.0000931351,0.004056679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485717,0.0004041617,0.04628954,0.0001611434,0.00002730781,0.003179966,0.0007434114,0.00004152753,0.0005812534],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02564672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1356344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01457768223746762,"score_gpt":0.3788567605655718,"score_spread":0.3642790783281041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}