{"id":"W2043753646","doi":"10.2193/2007-550","title":"Development of a Sightability Model for Low‐Density Elk Populations in Ontario, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Cambrian College; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Deciduous; Cervus elaphus; Geography; Akaike information criterion; Forestry; Diameter at breast height; Ecology; Population; Cover (algebra); Aerial survey; Habitat; Tree canopy; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Cartography; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006511396,0.000141866,0.000284528,0.00009278837,0.00008340654,0.00001394112,0.0002735373,0.00002917757,0.0001033807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001345394,0.0001215815,0.00008986285,0.0001492773,0.00002410146,0.0001837814,0.00009707657,0.0001156755,0.000001744828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001222825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001370248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8959505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981625,0.00002176373,0.0008103056,0.0001832737,0.0005753186,0.0002468585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993176,0.00001447208,0.000348333,0.0001929536,0.00002272925,0.0001039178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004519982,0.001859632,0.3496387,0.000167983,0.0001794809,0.00009288669,0.00372032,0.4748948,0.000215264,0.001764906,0.1171477,0.04986632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001254127,0.00007784677,0.950716,0.00009212393,0.00005378989,0.000002320805,0.0002101147,0.01166945,0.00004831264,0.002530371,0.03313327,0.0002122944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687734,0.000008107232,0.02560059,0.001791284,0.0001542932,0.0004539824,0.000002252086,0.000004426012,0.003211614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532087,0.000004554271,0.044659,0.00129411,0.00001804691,0.000006410168,0.00000342519,0.000005672039,0.0008000534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7946815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9047157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02728754800311587,"score_gpt":0.2345654544076386,"score_spread":0.2072779064045227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}