{"id":"W2043759984","doi":"10.1097/00000539-200103000-00029","title":"Examining the Evidence in Anesthesia Literature: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Critical appraisal; MEDLINE; Intensive care medicine; Anesthesia; Alternative medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1647141,0.0005898315,0.006486962,0.0006847071,0.0001728129,0.001084849,0.003794546,0.0001995192,0.001334021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1426518,0.000246225,0.001801473,0.005584016,0.0002534059,0.0007067575,0.000071635,0.0003980461,0.00147296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003946916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009045937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002759277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002576329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.945771,0.03277042,0.01418028,0.001367448,0.005312477,0.0005983177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8937797,0.08377871,0.008787526,0.01119673,0.002052085,0.0004052638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001786784,0.0008643266,0.7668754,0.03793391,0.000502754,0.007450032,0.02020739,0.0002166043,0.0006376061,0.07344982,0.07906314,0.01262029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001028612,0.000955157,0.6592239,0.1100768,0.003614811,0.03122409,0.01151448,0.02428894,0.0001026619,0.01136115,0.143722,0.002887364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8259184,0.1465723,0.005461881,0.01567937,0.0001639617,0.004768648,9.112538e-7,0.00002787016,0.001406714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945115,0.001344953,0.001637714,0.0009879916,0.0001131658,0.0003026747,0.000002174361,0.00002718052,0.001072612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1685932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6834227979759943,"score_gpt":0.5099081162515999,"score_spread":0.1735146817243943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}