{"id":"W2043769126","doi":"10.1109/mwscas.2013.6674839","title":"SAT-based reversible gate/wire replacement fault testing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Backtracking; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Boolean satisfiability problem; Automatic test pattern generation; Satisfiability; Fault coverage; Process (computing); Logic gate; Fault (geology); Algorithm; Matching (statistics); Test set; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Electronic circuit; Mathematics; Electrical engineering; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004761113,0.0004931401,0.000490217,0.0007342572,0.0002497487,0.0004834268,0.001300593,0.0005236798,0.003778775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001659145,0.0002014243,0.0007521319,0.0008328576,0.0007233432,0.0008476077,0.0004773455,0.0004545318,0.0005540713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000555065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005312752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001371588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002086805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992998,0.0002340436,0.00003666176,0.0001151205,0.0002516946,0.00006263101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998656,0.0007518707,0.0001423454,0.0002719966,0.0001488397,0.00002885109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006095748,0.0003074264,0.00378075,0.0006397562,0.0001782868,0.0007015634,0.0001563571,0.4189014,0.1387166,0.09301475,0.003727349,0.3392662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007713935,0.0003528743,0.0008473899,0.00002091471,0.00005899506,0.0003578651,0.00003399945,0.921995,0.05490732,0.01849478,0.002830207,0.00002364385],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1415737,0.0006266293,0.8436291,0.0002533295,0.00005681666,0.0002155404,0.0005329723,0.003090651,0.01002128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7949538,0.0003119417,0.2008574,0.0001706734,0.00003386114,0.0001193342,0.001047559,0.0001191729,0.002386201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003778775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01264131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03183791520571647,"score_gpt":0.2302638229495488,"score_spread":0.1984259077438323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}