{"id":"W2043831517","doi":"10.5558/tfc78843-6","title":"Saskatchewan forest carbon sequestration project","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"SaskTel (Canada); Prince Albert Grand Council; Natural Resources Canada; Saskatchewan Research Council (Canada); Environment and Climate Change Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Greenhouse gas; Carbon credit; Carbon stock; Environmental science; Stock (firearms); Carbon accounting; Forest management; Natural resource economics; Forestry; Business; Environmental protection; Agroforestry; Climate change; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00123792,0.0003651151,0.0001801261,0.001409005,0.001953332,0.002085383,0.0006868189,0.0005560733,0.009801733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001392959,0.0002569974,0.0002712981,0.003543192,0.0005695411,0.0008328762,0.0009320838,0.0009285202,0.00127463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02216021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07114287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8519988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9577953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992085,0.0001070395,0.00003879019,0.00007841724,0.0004738402,0.00009343163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979281,0.0002527011,0.00008629587,0.0001019158,0.001532016,0.0000990128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003834656,0.000155939,0.02064795,0.003871647,0.0002605807,0.001579881,0.001296378,0.004406964,0.01210824,0.0622329,0.3141475,0.5789086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003953067,0.00005176893,0.03233836,0.0007306514,0.00008257786,0.0001742202,0.0007276633,0.000446516,0.003975281,0.002409551,0.9589639,0.00006000217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1038328,0.09421736,0.007890203,0.02393826,0.00191523,0.002532595,0.04435764,0.0006100516,0.720706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3345475,0.09979379,0.01823189,0.01217346,0.00009474525,0.002113631,0.02722261,0.0001402634,0.5056822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1480012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2977456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02591591046992478,"score_gpt":0.2248087924833208,"score_spread":0.198892882013396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}