{"id":"W2043876844","doi":"10.1139/a09-012","title":"Ground vegetation as an indicator of ecological integrity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Ecological indicator; Indicator value; Ecology; Biodiversity; Vegetation (pathology); Indicator species; Context (archaeology); Species richness; Environmental science; Biological integrity; Ecosystem; Geography; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002920766,0.00008964829,0.000210232,0.000003605486,0.00009568559,0.000005499475,0.0001217243,0.0000828276,0.0005030603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003094126,0.00003122669,0.00006784798,0.00004244153,0.00007712354,0.00009033305,0.00001935771,0.0001127555,0.0002562361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000195276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001025772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008647561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000800674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992719,0.0001423046,0.0002173916,0.0001735108,0.00007843332,0.0001164476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997234,0.00007062314,0.0001175028,0.00003625498,4.541981e-7,0.00005175459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003269859,0.0009446783,0.09889007,0.000005308093,0.00001235167,0.00000659464,0.0001593759,1.021281e-7,0.1488957,0.0003596351,0.0004230374,0.7502705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004216638,0.000723639,0.9477873,0.000007493987,0.00001016311,0.00000574963,0.00006896706,0.000001676676,0.0004433913,0.0009908618,0.04984684,0.0000717225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950101,0.003458902,4.106808e-7,0.0003484173,0.00003859757,0.0002009154,0.000006466622,0.00001034532,0.000925866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942679,0.00476764,0.00009614334,0.0006979944,0.00005339807,0.000008547428,0.00004938642,1.970081e-7,0.00005880707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8488973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5508158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03057107106136939,"score_gpt":0.2507409186834891,"score_spread":0.2201698476221197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}