{"id":"W2043876844","doi":"10.1139/a09-012","title":"Ground vegetation as an indicator of ecological integrity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Ecological indicator; Indicator value; Ecology; Biodiversity; Vegetation (pathology); Indicator species; Context (archaeology); Species richness; Environmental science; Biological integrity; Ecosystem; Geography; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001322655,0.0004264879,0.0005484745,0.002573065,0.0001722554,0.001086333,0.0003794202,0.0003962253,0.0007404463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001862962,0.0001042838,0.0002093668,0.002795396,0.0007051175,0.0006901717,0.0003655606,0.0004288704,0.0002086512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004522926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003876477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001974915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004218179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992343,0.0003342761,0.00005064046,0.0001079361,0.0002376631,0.00003521854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985058,0.00064105,0.0004952089,0.00004737393,0.0002413893,0.00006919474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001842856,0.0001154323,0.2011719,0.004843397,0.0003750034,0.0002343668,0.001068471,0.002927413,0.01982776,0.01086366,0.003667288,0.754721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001262767,0.001120634,0.8576676,0.002562543,0.00051922,0.002087633,0.00290379,0.003915307,0.01046492,0.01239307,0.1062404,0.0001124675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3578755,0.5732697,0.03330131,0.001738086,0.0005409828,0.00009919314,0.0007357156,0.000123398,0.03231616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7881632,0.17951,0.02735503,0.0002139479,0.0003181499,0.00005626031,0.0004677683,0.00002171771,0.003893912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002573065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006994963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03057107106136939,"score_gpt":0.2507409186834891,"score_spread":0.2201698476221197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}