{"id":"W2043910042","doi":"10.1007/s11770-010-0259-8","title":"An iterative curvelet thresholding algorithm for seismic random noise attenuation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Geophysics","topic":"Image and Signal Denoising Methods","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Ocean Sciences; University of British Columbia; Jilin University","keywords":"Curvelet; Thresholding; Algorithm; Computer science; Deconvolution; Iterative method; Noise (video); Wavelet; Attenuation; Artificial intelligence; Norm (philosophy); Pattern recognition (psychology); Wavelet transform; Mathematics; Image (mathematics); Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006064487,0.0001827788,0.0002218707,0.00006089488,0.0002747509,0.0003316569,0.0005805679,0.00008217827,0.00000354197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001657338,0.0001730886,0.00008061606,0.0002697535,0.00004693366,0.000619918,0.00007144774,0.0002436966,0.00003985809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001379769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005516201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001476445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001415299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987805,0.0000498719,0.0001995301,0.0004491269,0.0002184084,0.0003024853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988222,0.000271903,0.0001105755,0.0005560304,0.0001547115,0.00008457148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002746873,0.00007296415,0.000004441872,0.000006596851,0.00001459677,0.000002163153,0.0009738168,0.0002156784,0.2247436,0.03517866,0.0002270225,0.738533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002857698,0.00009107055,0.0002633476,0.000006341869,0.0000195304,0.000004114134,0.00002384542,0.7629214,0.1029432,0.1287623,0.001743665,0.0003634627],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04183677,0.000006581341,0.95632,0.0001173856,0.0004988673,0.0004421422,0.00001008533,0.0001381527,0.0006299402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4639727,0.000001137017,0.5344955,0.000768194,0.0005240249,0.0001057845,0.00003576723,0.00001865758,0.00007817763],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7627057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7058346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01365121630758865,"score_gpt":0.2780172786429815,"score_spread":0.2643660623353929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}