{"id":"W2043938249","doi":"10.1109/qbsc.2012.6221371","title":"Outage probability of rateless codes in memoryless erasure channels","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Error Correcting Code Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Erasure; Decoding methods; Fountain code; Computer science; Binary erasure channel; Channel (broadcasting); Algorithm; Online codes; Simple (philosophy); Erasure code; Probability distribution; Probability of error; Mathematics; Channel capacity; Statistics; Sequential decoding; Concatenated error correction code; Block code; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003095724,0.00114618,0.001405157,0.001028924,0.000655383,0.001309851,0.001134336,0.001459728,0.0007343492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01798839,0.0004702162,0.0004759301,0.001142183,0.002579852,0.002683088,0.001484611,0.001270142,0.0001673083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001642114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001083441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003209613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001605496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979488,0.00074746,0.00007032825,0.0001915929,0.0006796037,0.0003621885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836642,0.01304693,0.00139288,0.0007068663,0.000979453,0.0002096311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000156224,0.00002901167,0.001634168,0.0001166286,0.00002952517,0.0003425474,0.0001811845,0.9462709,0.002446785,0.04265979,0.0003652649,0.005768027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006090934,0.00002525766,0.0003706939,0.00001683072,0.00001080616,0.000107591,0.00002755425,0.9858943,0.001333931,0.01209669,0.00009411191,0.00001611102],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2918604,0.002093642,0.6995563,0.0006075111,0.00007512826,0.0000388493,0.0002556377,0.0004849209,0.005027727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880515,0.0007570088,0.009763251,0.00006567958,0.00004297983,0.00002790985,0.00007301654,0.00006166378,0.001157013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003209613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01637197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03904096137920101,"score_gpt":0.2838515716197916,"score_spread":0.2448106102405906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}