{"id":"W2043943400","doi":"10.1007/s40273-013-0035-8","title":"A Comparative Analysis of Models Used to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for the Prevention of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PharmacoEconomics","topic":"Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dabigatran; Medicine; Warfarin; Quality-adjusted life year; Stroke (engine); Cost effectiveness; Atrial fibrillation; Health economics; Markov model; Actuarial science; Statistics; Public health; Markov chain; Risk analysis (engineering); Internal medicine; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03819573,0.002794997,0.003149677,0.005876627,0.0006281275,0.002897961,0.00299908,0.002719453,0.004198823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1052291,0.00120592,0.008885227,0.003172742,0.0005810302,0.002337904,0.001497458,0.002219881,0.000273772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009496453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003619571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01520521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007948256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795347,0.0166448,0.001108918,0.0007732837,0.001356878,0.0005813978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8567007,0.1330286,0.003208383,0.002024253,0.004504828,0.0005332273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003767721,0.0004142996,0.007792752,0.002615101,0.006417094,0.0002035588,0.0001476995,0.9432123,0.0002167635,0.009907056,0.001598973,0.02370668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00124324,0.003841868,0.00859487,0.00171628,0.007204499,0.0002473082,0.0002589704,0.9596916,0.0006043334,0.01309883,0.003310467,0.0001877704],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7436361,0.06731589,0.1421354,0.003830151,0.001198613,0.003430927,0.009996162,0.0007207791,0.02773603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590124,0.008014532,0.02718983,0.0003271304,0.0001166827,0.001910049,0.002068419,0.0001293233,0.001231612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03819573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2020007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2647009948908782,"score_gpt":0.4644796409257606,"score_spread":0.1997786460348823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}