{"id":"W2043996690","doi":"10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.018","title":"Vibration analysis of tapered composite beams using a higher-order finite element. Part I: Formulation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Composite Structures","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Classification of discontinuities; Structural engineering; Vibration; Beam (structure); Parametric statistics; Curvature; Stress (linguistics); Stiffness; Materials science; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Physics; Acoustics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007541045,0.0003272245,0.0005752387,0.0007067302,0.0001723527,0.0001058223,0.0002072587,0.0001382825,0.0005568186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005490078,0.0003205799,0.0002806804,0.001738348,0.00003735579,0.0003753241,0.00005003394,0.0001490054,0.000002495781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001342713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001305678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004134949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008256551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982538,0.00005337651,0.0007311242,0.0003092959,0.0003588342,0.0002936274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990077,0.00006439994,0.0002210835,0.000413184,0.0002039671,0.0000896393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000252506,0.00001398308,0.002368395,0.00002657689,0.001187542,5.471116e-7,0.000238585,0.8811775,0.1112871,0.0005704026,0.00006848184,0.00303555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003974696,0.00002697176,0.03044064,0.00001860701,0.001747929,0.000001596474,0.000009434363,0.9437296,0.02144784,0.0001902381,0.001660767,0.000328882],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7159272,0.0006611635,0.2812708,0.00006011306,0.0003211302,0.000267161,0.00009405927,0.0002190507,0.0011793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9531502,0.00003925928,0.04551587,0.00009350153,0.0002465502,0.000004389095,0.0008857189,0.00003843977,0.00002608669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.237223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01068840428864568,"score_gpt":0.2377011397301681,"score_spread":0.2270127354415224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}