{"id":"W2044082814","doi":"10.1177/1757975910383936","title":"Assessing the benefits of participatory research: a rationale for a realist review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Global Health Promotion","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Transferability; Community-based participatory research; Psychological intervention; Stakeholder; Agency (philosophy); Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Health care; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Sociology; Incentive; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6789522,0.00460091,0.009245029,0.02082378,0.007751238,0.01901337,0.0126335,0.02660552,0.003796248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6871992,0.004904044,0.007021011,0.0132428,0.04573387,0.02797959,0.01988471,0.017047,0.001933224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01728534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0369688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002070381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003116815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1680682,0.6906986,0.06727913,0.01663434,0.05451626,0.002803427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2549788,0.6328045,0.02715085,0.03701214,0.04405168,0.004002139],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001359759,0.0003301638,0.003482772,0.1338004,0.003039723,0.001860449,0.03392059,0.002117855,0.001460952,0.6999155,0.01830865,0.1004032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004759909,0.0009205925,0.001284274,0.182511,0.002842285,0.001310365,0.008355824,0.00647921,0.001745666,0.6113145,0.1779978,0.0004785956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005706039,0.1186872,0.4376363,0.2210395,0.01042415,0.1906228,0.0008882195,0.0003678252,0.01462797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07767236,0.02034204,0.5389612,0.04022139,0.001885521,0.3193364,0.0001907392,0.0001295671,0.001260879],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3210478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3959091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9720495406671948,"score_gpt":0.8051244494776196,"score_spread":0.1669250911895752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}