{"id":"W2044225824","doi":"10.1177/030908920302700402","title":"Pyrrhon, Pyrrhus and the Possibility of the Past: A Response to David Henige","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Study of the Old Testament","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Conviction; CLARITY; Faith; Atheism; Argumentative; Historiography; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00560321,0.0005360275,0.001147323,0.001146017,0.007981095,0.006672948,0.002131251,0.01466011,0.002479397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01377688,0.000531179,0.0003788798,0.001344111,0.02172855,0.009580927,0.003668848,0.02093462,0.0005668846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00763743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003652395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01909602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0297004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996919,0.001770165,0.00009938678,0.0004825764,0.0004683107,0.000260548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907535,0.007559041,0.0003394539,0.0002376247,0.0006249786,0.0004854055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005591201,0.00003217,0.000567115,0.0002021658,0.00001630421,0.0008850683,0.03819218,0.0002185447,0.0001736243,0.2397874,0.7109334,0.008936018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002194388,0.00002134514,0.0006285909,0.0005807279,0.000009048278,0.0005609135,0.01785034,0.0002207508,0.0002024215,0.04797493,0.9318732,0.00005578432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003035759,0.02625049,0.0001935525,0.9597421,0.005349446,0.000003533164,0.00001374098,0.00001239858,0.005398904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1808654,0.03445641,0.0009693536,0.7308673,0.02664283,0.00004545008,0.00003199494,0.0001554549,0.02596592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01909602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05541366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02459727994886257,"score_gpt":0.3243621762948217,"score_spread":0.2997648963459592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}