{"id":"W2044299689","doi":"10.1016/s0045-7949(03)00342-0","title":"Comparison of numerical techniques for 3D flutter analysis of cable-stayed bridges","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Structures","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Flutter; Structural engineering; Finite strip method; Finite element method; Aerodynamics; Engineering; Spline (mechanical); Stiffness; Deck; Aerodynamic force; Numerical analysis; STRIPS; Girder; Computer science; Mathematics; Aerospace engineering; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006238871,0.0001297845,0.0005192831,0.0003192359,0.00002775972,0.000018503,0.0001333551,0.00006361141,0.00005118638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001443006,0.0001209045,0.000229761,0.0005033974,0.00003571601,0.00003920667,0.00001351389,0.00005708016,1.690297e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002280101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009653293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002948302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001270754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992019,0.00002412629,0.0003773939,0.0001410008,0.0001227379,0.0001328443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995006,0.00007943982,0.00008300973,0.0002191096,0.0000786131,0.00003925754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006804928,0.00001722698,0.008886235,0.00006268004,0.001029762,1.791745e-7,0.0002146969,0.9789674,0.002356529,0.001940406,0.002164022,0.004354088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000994999,0.00003152161,0.006576488,0.000005240678,0.0004007591,2.908093e-7,0.00002426543,0.9711842,0.02032994,0.0001433588,0.001088216,0.0001162134],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04063686,0.0001341157,0.958759,0.0000130925,0.000102713,0.00009683397,0.00004111828,0.00007183879,0.0001443986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.871759,0.000006821243,0.1281124,0.00003133385,0.00001490941,0.000004613402,0.00005130705,0.00001301987,0.000006591034],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8311221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4930341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01189821393121475,"score_gpt":0.2775334004523602,"score_spread":0.2656351865211455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}