{"id":"W2044326206","doi":"10.1007/s11192-008-0220-2","title":"A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Library science; Citation analysis; Webometrics; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Sample (material); Impact factor; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Publishing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008835684,0.0005922791,0.001411922,0.05033898,0.001946635,0.01337978,0.00147489,0.002411094,0.01164822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08526275,0.0005054734,0.001490795,0.05118657,0.004460717,0.02082638,0.005228026,0.003044316,0.001409308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001429236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001511658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002521014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005235863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903353,0.002574511,0.001333788,0.0007921261,0.004573605,0.000390565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8029574,0.1479086,0.01886509,0.008409617,0.01879698,0.003062421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009590581,0.0003202641,0.5586047,0.003559727,0.002546305,0.001914372,0.01051922,0.0004028852,0.006077885,0.1084786,0.01905551,0.2875615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000145262,0.0005414673,0.6830616,0.003899182,0.003147718,0.005374757,0.02113774,0.001504033,0.005495341,0.1417984,0.1336245,0.0002699649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5905818,0.1373241,0.01901542,0.06165243,0.002223657,0.00008520686,0.01003707,0.0005071862,0.1785731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538846,0.0217498,0.007078629,0.003513538,0.003666196,0.0000641267,0.003234336,0.0002290271,0.006579754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04672813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5726813817650799,"score_gpt":0.5567807477511177,"score_spread":0.01590063401396213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}