{"id":"W2044326206","doi":"10.1007/s11192-008-0220-2","title":"A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Library science; Citation analysis; Webometrics; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Sample (material); Impact factor; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Publishing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06158305,0.0001795445,0.0003808583,0.2483297,0.0002090949,0.003611983,0.001883733,0.0002070862,0.0002956545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1921769,0.0001440193,0.00009545132,0.5391781,0.0002872671,0.003999108,0.0009399208,0.0003335925,0.0001327346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003777984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004307377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008616144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006853588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9797834,0.0002406213,0.001294367,0.00108498,0.01684294,0.0007536688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724427,0.02094738,0.0006786906,0.0007354334,0.004372299,0.0008234766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005946088,0.00004929365,0.8260859,0.000006706121,0.000004549861,0.000005882124,0.0008868973,0.00003081033,0.01218201,0.0002786964,0.001110754,0.1592991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007069465,0.0001980155,0.9824387,0.0000535971,0.000005681039,0.000001966001,0.0008031926,0.001849006,0.005668396,0.0061341,0.001961292,0.0001791179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728765,0.00912236,0.01575318,0.0004166511,0.0005281832,0.0002774931,0.00002254843,0.00001815375,0.0009849267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885912,0.0006787465,0.009100274,0.0000812181,0.00006168662,0.000002291321,0.000003677136,0.000009933621,0.001471007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2908484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5726813817650799,"score_gpt":0.5567807477511177,"score_spread":0.01590063401396213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}